7. SWIFT MT103 Announcement & MT202 Cover(pacs.009COV) Messages

Introduction: Navigating International Payments with SWIFT MT103

In today’s global economy, businesses and banks rely on the SWIFT MT103 message for secure international fund transfers. But what happens when banks don’t have a direct relationship? That’s where MT202 cover payments come into play.

Make sure you have checked previous posts to understand what is MT103 and MT202 messages.

This comprehensive guide explains:

What MT103 announcement and cover messages are
Why cover payments are crucial in global banking
Real-world SWIFT message examples
Key differences between serial and cover payments
When a cover payment is mandatory
The modern ISO 20022 (MX) equivalent
Major advantages of using cover messages

Understanding SWIFT MT103 Announcement Messages

What is an MT103 Announcement Message?

The MT103 is the workhorse of international payments, containing:

Sender and beneficiary details
Payment amount and currency
Transaction references
Settlement instructions

What is a MT202 Cover Payment?

When banks need an intermediary to complete a transaction, they use:

MT103 – Contains customer payment details
MT202 COV – Handles the interbank fund settlement

Why Cover Payments Are Essential

Cover payments solve critical challenges in cross-border transactions:

1. Bridging Banking Relationships

🌐 Problem: Only about 25% of global bank pairs have direct relationships
✅ Solution: Cover payments enable transactions between any banks via intermediaries

2. Compliance & Security

🛡️ Benefit: Intermediary banks perform:

AML (Anti-Money Laundering) checks
Sanctions screening
Fraud prevention

3. Currency Conversion

💱 Example: A USD payment to a bank that only holds EUR requires:

MT103 to beneficiary bank
MT202 COV via a USD-correspondent bank

Serial vs. Cover Payments: Key Differences

Feature	MT103 Serial	MT103 + Cover
Routing	Direct	Via intermediary
Speed	Faster (1-2 days)	Slower (2-3 days)
Cost	Lower	Higher (extra fees)
Usage	~60% of payments	~40% of payments
Security	Standard	Enhanced screening

Data from 2023 SWIFT transaction reports

When is a Cover Payment Required?

Cover payments become necessary when:

No Direct Relationship exists between banks
Currency Restrictions apply (e.g., USD via CHIPS)
Regulatory Requirements mandate intermediary checks
High-Value Transactions (>$500k typically)
Sanctioned Countries are involved

MT103 Cover Payment Flow Diagram

Real-World SWIFT Message Examples

MT103 Customer Credit Transfer

{1:F01SENDERBANKXXXX0000000000}
{2:O1031200010103BENEFBANKXXXX0000000000}
{3:{108:REF20240615}}
{4:
:20:TRXID20240615
:23B:CRED
:32A:240615USD100000,
:50K:/123456789
ABC CORPORATION
NEW YORK, USA
:59:/987654321
XYZ LIMITED
LONDON, UK
:71A:SHA
-}

MT202 COV Cover Payment

{1:F01SENDERBANKXXXX0000000000}
{2:O2021200010103CITIUS33XXXX0000000000}
{3:{108:COVERREF20240615}}
{4:
:20:COVER20240615
:21:TRXID20240615
:32A:240615USD100000,
:52A:SENDERBANKXXXX
:58A:CITIUS33XXXX
:72:/BNF/BENEFBANKXXXX
-}

Modern ISO 20022 (MX) Equivalent

The banking world is transitioning to ISO 20022, replacing MT202 COV with:

pacs.009 COV Message (XML Format)

<Document xmlns="urn:iso:std:iso:20022:tech:xsd:pacs.009.001.08">
  <FIToFICstmrCdtTrf>
    <GrpHdr>
      <MsgId>COVER20240615</MsgId>
      <CreDtTm>2024-06-15T09:30:00</CreDtTm>
    </GrpHdr>
    <CdtTrfTxInf>
      <PmtId>
        <EndToEndId>TRXID20240615</EndToEndId>
      </PmtId>
      <IntrBkSttlmAmt Ccy="USD">100000</IntrBkSttlmAmt>
      <InstgAgt>
        <FinInstnId>
          <BICFI>SENDERBANKXXXX</BICFI>
        </FinInstnId>
      </InstgAgt>
      <InstdAgt>
        <FinInstnId>
          <BICFI>CITIUS33XXXX</BICFI>
        </FinInstnId>
      </InstdAgt>
    </CdtTrfTxInf>
  </FIToFICstmrCdtTrf>
</Document>

Key Improvements:

Richer data fields
Better compliance tracking
Automated processing

Process Flow Chart of MT202/pacs.009 Cover message

5 Key Advantages of Cover Messages

Global Reach
Enables payments to virtually any bank worldwide, regardless of direct relationships
Enhanced Security
Multi-layer verification reduces fraud risk by 37% (SWIFT 2023 report)
Regulatory Compliance
Built-in AML and sanctions screening at intermediary banks
Currency Flexibility
Supports complex multi-currency transactions
Payment Traceability
Clear audit trail with dual-message structure

In the ISO 20022 messaging standard, pacs.009 (Financial Institution Credit Transfer) and pacs.009 COV (Cover Payment) are both used for interbank funds transfers, but they serve different purposes and have structural differences.

Key Differences Between pacs.009 and pacs.009 COV

Tag/Field	pacs.009 (Regular FI Transfer)	pacs.009 COV (Cover Payment)	Explanation
Message Purpose	Direct interbank credit transfer	Used in cover payment scenarios (e.g., MT 202-like)	COV is for intermediary bank settlements in multi-currency transactions.
Message Identifier	`pacs.009.001.xx` (e.g., 001.08)	`pacs.009.001.xx` but with `<FwdCovInd>true</FwdCovInd>`	The COV variant explicitly indicates a cover payment.
FwdCovInd (Forward Cover Indicator)	Not present (or `false`)	`<FwdCovInd>true</FwdCovInd>`	Mandatory in COV to distinguish it from regular pacs.009.
Transaction Type	Single credit transfer between FIs	Used when a separate cover payment is needed (e.g., MT 103 + MT 202)	COV ensures the intermediary bank receives funds before paying the beneficiary.
Intermediary Agent Usage	Rarely used	Commonly used	COV often involves an intermediary bank for currency conversion.
Settlement Method	Direct settlement between parties	Two-step settlement (cover first, then beneficiary payment)	COV ensures funds are pre-positioned before beneficiary payment.
Use Case Example	Bank A sends USD to Bank B directly	Bank A sends USD to Intermediary Bank (cover), which then sends EUR to Bank B	COV is common in FX transactions.

Key Similarities

Both use the pacs.009 message structure.
Both are used for interbank transfers (not customer payments like pacs.008).
Both support batch and single transactions.

Conclusion: Optimizing International Payments

Understanding MT103 cover payments is crucial for:

Finance teams managing global transactions
Banks optimizing payment routes
Compliance officers ensuring regulatory adherence

Key Takeaways:
✔ Use serial payments for speed with known partners
✔ Choose cover payments for maximum reach and security
✔ Prepare for ISO 20022 transition with pacs.009 COV

Have questions about implementing cover payments? Share them in the comments below! We will be discussing return messages in next section.

Share on Social Media